Comment by jellicle
10 years ago
If the link as posted in the story does not work for people, it does not work. That's your fault.
"Workarounds" which are already incorporated into the link by the time I see them are fine. Workarounds that require me to download seven apps and swing a chicken over my head while ROT13'ing the URL are... not.
It is the site's job (HN's job) to provide usable links to its readers. That is literally your only job, the only thing you are here for. If it fails, it fails, and it should be criticized for that.
> It is the site's job (HN's job) to provide usable links to its readers.
I think any talk about the responsibilities of an ad-free site to its readers, much less a statement that its job is to behave in the way that one of its readers prefers, is probably presumptuous at best.
>It is the site's job (HN's job) to provide usable links to its readers.
No, the site's job is to aggregate links and provide a platform for discussion. Providing usable links is the responsibility of the people posting the links - other readers. Links which don't generate quality discussion will be killed any number of ways, but the quality of user-generated content is entirely on the users generating it.
In this case, the value of being able to discuss certain kinds of content with minor workarounds is greater than not having that content at all.