Comment by anigbrowl

I agree with everything you said (and have made the same sort of point on many threads about the strategic imperative for corporations to pick such facially unfair fights). But what's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander - it's not that hard to obscure the beneficial ownership of a company, and setting up an SPV whose only purpose is to be towed out to sea and sunk (so to speak) is a well-established corporate strategy. Yes, it's a risky strategy, but only by employing such strategies can people respond to the inequitable business practices of large corporations.