Comment by jessaustin
10 years ago
If they're using it, they're doing so in completely different fashion than everyone else. That is, it's not public for viewing, submitting, commenting, etc. Indeed TFA indicates exactly the sorts of pain points that would be missed by those using the tool in such a radically different way than everyone else. If someone at GH had to wade through all the damn +1's then something would have been done about them years ago.
95% of all my github activity is in private repositories.
Ditto. Maybe 98%. I think that's a big part of the disconnect I'm seeing here in the comments. Those of us that live in private repos are likely pretty happy with how things currently work especially since we're the ones paying to use the service. If it wasn't working well for our teams, we'd find somewhere else to spend our money. That being said, we're certainly the minority when it comes to users on the platform.
I guarantee everyone maintaining a large public project on github has private repos and is paying for the service.
Open source ties in with my work. Every one of my private repos has open source dependencies hosted on github.
Privileging the priorities of my private repos over their public dependencies would be shortsighted.
1 reply →
>That being said, we're certainly the minority when it comes to users on the platform.
But you're the huge majority of people who give GitHub money. It makes sense not to prioritize the pain points of open-source projects when you lose money by hosting them.
4 replies →
GitHub pretty please, give us an option to hide our profile from search engines just like Facebook do.
What is the use-case of this?
3 replies →
Do you feel like your usage is typical?
I would guess that private repos have a much smaller user base, in that that they work for companies where they are trained in specific policies to submit issues and work with the repos. With public repos you're at the mercy of widely differing levels of user experience.
I think you should chill down with all the speculations. I only use it for private repos.
Go look at a project like Rails where you can tell they need it.
> If they're using it, they're doing so in completely different fashion than everyone else. That is, it's not public for viewing, submitting, commenting, etc
Huh? Github isn't opened sourced so how is a different fashion from anyone else using private repos?