← Back to context

Comment by anjc

10 years ago

I'd like some solid examples of what companies confirmed perceptions of competitors were in the same vertical, versus the reality.

Because even the author references competency-based views of competitive advantage, but for some reason ignores resource based views, and ignores the fact that companies might be aware of their competences. That is to say, I'm sure that large companies tend to mostly be aware of what their competences are based on the resources and knowledge that they have. If they don't have marketing departments that have analyzed the ERP market, sales teams with ERP training, tech departments with key HR, key knowledge etc etc, then I'm certain they are very well aware of this.

Maybe some companies have had marketing missteps and have made poor strategic and competitive decisions, however, but I really doubt that it's due to a lack of introspection or simple analysis as described.

Also, IBM didn't "think nothing much" of the software layer. They misunderstood the nature of power in the supply chain, and most importantly, didn't solidify their position within the supply chain while they were dominant.

They think they know their competencies (database systems in one case, virtualization in another) but often they misunderstand what customers really value up the stack - in this example, Workday customers really don't care if it runs Oracle or MySQL or non RDBMS at all. In AWS case, we don't care for kvm vs VMware wars.

(I am the author of the TechCrunch post.)