Comment by cperciva
10 years ago
How so? Reference to voting rings is clutching at straws... because it's something Dan was explicitly concerned about last week?
10 years ago
How so? Reference to voting rings is clutching at straws... because it's something Dan was explicitly concerned about last week?
He got more votes in the first round alone than the "winner" in the second round, and twice that amount the second time. The will of the community was pretty clear the first time around, and it only got stronger when new hoops were added; this not just from votes but from comment threads. Invoking "voting fraud" is clutching at straws. Kevin didn't like him - fine, let's just say so and move on, it's their money and all, but don't try to hide behind some sort of hacking (eh) or fraud that never was.