Comment by slantedview
9 years ago
One of the commenters on the Krebs post makes a remarkable point [1]:
"It gets better. Do a dig mx clintonemail.com. You’ll see that the machine’s incoming email was filtered by mxlogic.net, a spam filtering service that works by received all your emails, filtering out the spam, and forwarding you the rest.
This is because the hosting provider, Platte River Network, sold a package along with the hosting. The package included spam filtering and full-disk off-site backup (since then seized by the FBI).
So every email received by Clinton was going through many unsecured places, including a spam filtering queue, a backup appliance and an off-site backup server. Which has already been documented."
http://krebsonsecurity.com/2016/05/did-the-clinton-email-ser...
Haha yeah I've actually seen her supporters claim the MX filtering meant it was "secure"! facepalm
oh my god, this is depressing sad.
She could have hired a team of machine learning grad students to build her a personalized spam filter.
but she went with the cheapest option.
this is going to keep me upset for a while.
"She" did nothing of the sort. She told someone she wanted her email available. They said, ok, we'll just host it ourselves. "Whatever, I want my daily suduko and make sure I stop getting those damn linked-in spams". "Ok boss".
Seriously, how could anyone really believe she specc'd this out herself? Her staff probably threw it together as a MVP with the full intention of revisiting the implementation "really soon".
And then they lost interest.
She asked and they gave her options she didn't like and then worked around it. Big difference
2 replies →
> She could have hired a team of machine learning grad students to build her a personalized spam filter.
Or instead of reinventing the wheel, installed an existing spam detection product like SpamAssassin on the email server.
Or, truly the craziest of possible scenarios: simply followed the instructions given to her by the people administering her access to the government's IT infrastructure.
1 reply →