Comment by waterlesscloud

Hmm. What I meant to get at is that the clause seemed more likely to relate to the "we didn't discriminate against you in letting you go" thing, which he also mentions. In other words, not only will you not sue us for discriminating against you, you won't go around saying we did either.

Bottom line, I think it's much more likely that he's misinterpreted the document than that they're trying to silence him.

What are they afraid of, that he'll reveal big consultancies tell clients what they want to hear? That's not really a news flash, is it?