← Back to context Comment by regularfry 16 years ago Isn't the "billion dollars destroyed" argument he makes just the broken window fallacy in reverse? 1 comment regularfry Reply devinj 16 years ago If by, "broken window fallacy in reverse" you mean "pointing out that the broken window fallacy is a fallacy", yes. He is troubled by the fact that he is earning money by breaking windows.
devinj 16 years ago If by, "broken window fallacy in reverse" you mean "pointing out that the broken window fallacy is a fallacy", yes. He is troubled by the fact that he is earning money by breaking windows.
If by, "broken window fallacy in reverse" you mean "pointing out that the broken window fallacy is a fallacy", yes. He is troubled by the fact that he is earning money by breaking windows.