← Back to context Comment by baldeagle 9 years ago I like how the traditional 'five whys' approach wouldn't work here... the answer was in a 'how'. 3 comments baldeagle Reply DougBTX 9 years ago Perhaps a "why is there a timeout?" would have lead to a "why is this traceroure so long?" then "why is there a loop?" and "why is my test router in the list?" jedimastert 9 years ago > 'five whys' approachCan you explain this a bit more? resoluteteeth 9 years ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5_Whys
DougBTX 9 years ago Perhaps a "why is there a timeout?" would have lead to a "why is this traceroure so long?" then "why is there a loop?" and "why is my test router in the list?"
jedimastert 9 years ago > 'five whys' approachCan you explain this a bit more? resoluteteeth 9 years ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5_Whys
Perhaps a "why is there a timeout?" would have lead to a "why is this traceroure so long?" then "why is there a loop?" and "why is my test router in the list?"
> 'five whys' approach
Can you explain this a bit more?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5_Whys