← Back to context

Comment by taviso

8 years ago

correct

Have you asked them for an eta on your shirt?

  • You know a company isn't serious about security when their top security bounty is a t-shirt. Instagram has a better policy, for God's sake.

fuck :(

  • Indeed, this is the point in the comment thread where you get the feeling the internet is broken.

    • What I'm wondering: how many fuckups like this need to happen for website owners to realize that uber-centralization of vital online infrastructure is a bad idea?

      But I guess there is really no incentive for anyone in particular to do anything about this, because it provides a kind of perverted safety in numbers. "It's not just our website that had this issue, it's, like, everyone's shared problem." The same principle applies to uber-hosting providers like AWS and Azure, as well as those creepy worldwide CDNs.

      Interestingly, it seems this is one of the cases where using a smaller provider with the same issue would really make you better off (relatively speaking) because there would be fewer servers leaking your data.

      9 replies →

    • The Internet will remain periodically broken until we put a cost metric on the breaking (and working) times.

  • It may seem like a nightmare Internet data security scenario, but it looks like Tavis is going to get a free t-shirt out of the deal, so let's just call it a wash.