← Back to context Comment by brudgers 8 years ago Date: 2008 3 comments brudgers Reply ColinWright 8 years ago Do you think it's now invalid? Do you think anything has changed? I'd be interested to hear of any news that you think would update this. brudgers 8 years ago Not at all, and that's why I upvoted it.I mentioned the date because it is traditional in titles. Here it might put comparisons to ES9 and complaints about display on the iPhone 10s in context (I'm optimistic). Pessimistically, it might give fair warning that hyperlinks from the page 404. pozorvlak 8 years ago Thanks! I've now updated the post to reflect some corrections here, and to point out the 404ing link.
ColinWright 8 years ago Do you think it's now invalid? Do you think anything has changed? I'd be interested to hear of any news that you think would update this. brudgers 8 years ago Not at all, and that's why I upvoted it.I mentioned the date because it is traditional in titles. Here it might put comparisons to ES9 and complaints about display on the iPhone 10s in context (I'm optimistic). Pessimistically, it might give fair warning that hyperlinks from the page 404. pozorvlak 8 years ago Thanks! I've now updated the post to reflect some corrections here, and to point out the 404ing link.
brudgers 8 years ago Not at all, and that's why I upvoted it.I mentioned the date because it is traditional in titles. Here it might put comparisons to ES9 and complaints about display on the iPhone 10s in context (I'm optimistic). Pessimistically, it might give fair warning that hyperlinks from the page 404. pozorvlak 8 years ago Thanks! I've now updated the post to reflect some corrections here, and to point out the 404ing link.
pozorvlak 8 years ago Thanks! I've now updated the post to reflect some corrections here, and to point out the 404ing link.
Do you think it's now invalid? Do you think anything has changed? I'd be interested to hear of any news that you think would update this.
Not at all, and that's why I upvoted it.
I mentioned the date because it is traditional in titles. Here it might put comparisons to ES9 and complaints about display on the iPhone 10s in context (I'm optimistic). Pessimistically, it might give fair warning that hyperlinks from the page 404.
Thanks! I've now updated the post to reflect some corrections here, and to point out the 404ing link.