Comment by protomyth
8 years ago
Isn't Mozilla organized as a for-profit that owns a non-profit? Actually, if you look at US tax law there are reasons that some non-profits have for-profit parts. I know Mayo was organized that way. I think it had to do with some salary requirements, but its been twenty years, so I'm a bit fuzzy.
There is a non-profit (The Mozilla Foundation, affectionately referred to as "mofo") which owns a for-profit (The Mozilla Corporation, known as "moco") as a wholly-owned subsidiary.
The corporation is governed by the same rules as the foundation, compare https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/foundation/
> Our work is guided by the Mozilla Manifesto.
to https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/foundation/moco/
> The Mozilla Corporation is guided by the principles of the Mozilla Manifesto.
(I'm an employee of moco, I've always felt like I'm working at a values-based rather than a profit-based organization, personally.)
I guess my point is that the profit status might not be the most important thing to determine what values your organization has.
The Mozilla non profit is the owner of a for profit company that carries out much of their activity. Which you probably meant, but you've typed it the other way around.
Yeah, I meant in the same way as Mayo (NP -> FP). Not enough coffee, thanks.