← Back to context

Comment by JumpCrisscross

9 years ago

To add to this, race is a protected class [1]. We carefully and conservatively enumerate the classes a business holding itself out to the public may not discriminate based on. Political ideology is not a protected class almost anywhere in America.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protected_class

Of course, but you're ignoring that protected class status is usually granted when discrimination be so pervasive that it is a burden its recipients.

If it becomes commonplace to discriminate against people based on their political ideology then we may very well see the 'political party' protection broadened.

  • There are two discussions encapsulated in your comment. One, should political ideology be a protected class? And two, if so, how would you delineate protected "political ideology," something inherently more difficult to observe than ethnicity or sex, from unprotected views?

    • > How would you delineate 'protected ideology'?

      The same way we deal with sexuality as a protected class, which is to say poorly but better than nothing.

      > Should political ideology be a protected class?

      I think it should, I wouldn't have said it was necessary in years past but it really seems like we're heading down a road where people are going to have to signal the 'right' political values in order to get hired.