← Back to context Comment by mikeash 9 years ago Please do. I'd like to see it. 3 comments mikeash Reply snakeanus 9 years ago Free speech harms nobody. DOS attacks harm the people whose service is denied to. mikeash 9 years ago I don't think Cloudflare is providing the DDOS part, though. Their involvement is limited to serving the web sites i.e. speech. snakeanus 9 years ago > I don't think Cloudflare is providing the DDOS partI did not claim that they did.> Their involvement is limited to serving the web sites i.e. speechI guess so.
snakeanus 9 years ago Free speech harms nobody. DOS attacks harm the people whose service is denied to. mikeash 9 years ago I don't think Cloudflare is providing the DDOS part, though. Their involvement is limited to serving the web sites i.e. speech. snakeanus 9 years ago > I don't think Cloudflare is providing the DDOS partI did not claim that they did.> Their involvement is limited to serving the web sites i.e. speechI guess so.
mikeash 9 years ago I don't think Cloudflare is providing the DDOS part, though. Their involvement is limited to serving the web sites i.e. speech. snakeanus 9 years ago > I don't think Cloudflare is providing the DDOS partI did not claim that they did.> Their involvement is limited to serving the web sites i.e. speechI guess so.
snakeanus 9 years ago > I don't think Cloudflare is providing the DDOS partI did not claim that they did.> Their involvement is limited to serving the web sites i.e. speechI guess so.
Free speech harms nobody. DOS attacks harm the people whose service is denied to.
I don't think Cloudflare is providing the DDOS part, though. Their involvement is limited to serving the web sites i.e. speech.
> I don't think Cloudflare is providing the DDOS part
I did not claim that they did.
> Their involvement is limited to serving the web sites i.e. speech
I guess so.