← Back to context Comment by bryanrasmussen 9 years ago how many decades of software is your QA process, with its automated tests, covering? 1 comment bryanrasmussen Reply jononor 9 years ago Only 1 so far. My point was mostly that binary patching is generally bad, and should be avoided. It could very well be the least-bad option in this particular case. Its certainly much better than leaving security holes unfixed.
jononor 9 years ago Only 1 so far. My point was mostly that binary patching is generally bad, and should be avoided. It could very well be the least-bad option in this particular case. Its certainly much better than leaving security holes unfixed.
Only 1 so far. My point was mostly that binary patching is generally bad, and should be avoided. It could very well be the least-bad option in this particular case. Its certainly much better than leaving security holes unfixed.