Comment by kazinator
8 years ago
Shows you how resilient car and cdr have been against decades of complaining and bikeshedding. That just reaffirms them.
8 years ago
Shows you how resilient car and cdr have been against decades of complaining and bikeshedding. That just reaffirms them.
I would accept that if Lisp were a runaway success, but it's not. It is very nearly a dead language [1]. It is entirely possible that the unwillingness of the Lisp community to give up in this obscure terminology in favor of something more user friendly contributed to its demise.
[1] Look at e.g. https://madnight.github.io/githut/. The most popular Lisp is Clojure, with a whopping 0.33% market share. Scheme and Common Lisp don't even make it to the top 50.
> It is entirely possible that the unwillingness of the Lisp community to give up in this obscure terminology in favor of something more user friendly contributed to its demise.
What more-user-friendly terminology do you suggest?
Did you not read the upstream comments? FST and RST, or LHS and RHS depending on whether the intent is to access the cons as a linked list or a pair.
3 replies →
CL was #45 in the car quarter of 2017; by cadr, it slipped into the long(er) tail.