← Back to context

Comment by ckastner

8 years ago

> This is still very much sci-fi at the moment for anything flying above a 250 km earth orbit because atmospheric density decreases dramatically fast with altitude.

One of my favorite takes on this concept was Poul Anderson's Tau Zero [1], which used a Bussard ramjet [2]. Apparently, in the 70s, in was thought that there was enough hydrogen surrounding our solar system to support interstellar travel.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tau_Zero

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bussard_ramjet

Tau Zero should be better known. I read it again recently after many years, I couldn't put it down. It's a pity that more real histories don't end like this:

"I sure as hell can. Once a crisis is past, once people can manage for themselves ... what better can a king do for them than take off his crown?"

How can you decelerate with a ramjet? Wouldn't your own exhaust push the matter you needed out of the way?

  • You could push the exhaust single-file in a highly focused beam, leaving most of the solid angle around you unpushed.

Bussard Ramjets can be useful for interstellar travel. The net thrust is not great, but for very long and relatively slow trips it let's you power a very large ship without dragging along as much fuel assuming you can get hydrogen only fusion to work.

  • People who have looked at particular instances of fusion-powered ramjets have found that they don't produce enough thrust to overcome drag:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bussard_ramjet

    More recent thinking on the concept has centered around magsails which turn the drag into a good thing. Decelerating a starship is an even tougher problem than accelerating one, and magsails are a great choice for that. (And might even be able to get a speed of 0.2% of light for departure on the solar wind)

    • You need fuel for more than just propulsion. A hybrid engine that provides trust to offset the drag while also powering a ship is very viable.

      Remember, drag is a function of relative speeds. A hypothetical example with zero velocity would allow you to gather fuel without any drag.

      Now for a very large and 'slow' generation ship you need a lot of energy to keep the crew alive, able to manufacture repair parts, keep the lights on etc. Now, say you want need 1 ounce of fuel per hour that does not seem bad but if your talking a 100,000+ year trip that's 54+ million pounds.

      Sure, that kind of trip does not seem appealing, but remember taking 4x the mass at 1/2 the speed takes the same energy. Further you are going to want to bootstrap a civilization at the other end which means outside of grey goo taking a lot of stuff. With the added benefit of being able to go somewhere else.

      PS: You also get more energy from hydrogen the further up the chain you go. A multi stage reactor that's spitting out lead provides more energy.

      3 replies →