Comment by eldavido
8 years ago
There's another facet to this story that's not getting discussed: that of path dependence.
The OP is Silicon Valley royalty. This matters. His site is pretty humble, but this guy was like, employee #10 at facebook and is probably worth high 8/low 9 figures. He is respected in a way most people aren't.
Boz can come in and start making these changes. Most people can't. We need to talk about this more. We labor under this bizarre illusion of non-hierarchical workplaces in Silicon Valley, when the reality is and always has been, some people have more influence than others.
I find it helpful to keep in mind the circumstances about the advice-giver as much as the advice itself. I'm not saying there aren't good nuggets of advice to glean. But who you are and your track record really matter in Silicon Valley and we should acknowledge that. It's not as much of a pure idea meritocracy as people think/pretend.
After a while I started thinking "flat org" meant "it takes longer to figure out who makes the decision."
After a while longer, I changed that to "regardless of the org structure, the org chart doesn't fully capture who has influence and who doesn't."
https://www.wired.com/2014/03/tyranny-flatness/
refers to the 1972 essay The Tyranny of Structurelessness by Jo Freeman. http://www.jofreeman.com/joreen/tyranny.htm
Nothing new under the sun.