Comment by gamblor956
7 years ago
The table is correct. 100% correct. It's maintained by a law school, and is verified by a professor of Constitutional Law at least annually.
As a lawyer, I trust the Cornell Legal Information Institute. I have used it in my practice.
You know how the CDC was banned from advocating gun control in 1996 because of the junk studies the Clinton admin pushed for in 1992 as justification for their upcoming gun control legislation? It came out of Harvard and Princeton. Almost all discredited, full data never released, one of the main "researches" still employed at Harvard.
Bloomberg just gave Johns Hopkins and Yale money to "study" gun control (with outcomes predetermined). And a few years ago gave Harvard $350 MILLION to push the same agenda.
You can take that garbage they push and eat it up, they're paying good money for exactly that.
I wonder what the Joyce Foundation gives to Cornell every year?
The LII is literally just an accessible form of the various federal codes, statutes, regulations, and certain administrative rulings. It can be verified against paper copies or against paid services like Westlaw and Nexis.
The LII has been around for more than a decade. The LII is used by progressives, conservatives, libertarians, socialists, the current (Trump) administration and the former (Obama) administration, all with no complaints. It has been used by lawyers and judges on every side of the aisle. If there was any bias, it would have come out by now.
What point are you trying to make? That Cornell law school is trying to be political here?
Something something east-coast liberal elitism something something corruption.