← Back to context

Comment by laumars

8 years ago

I think you're clutching at straws to be honest.

> If you download the package sources manually, the effort required to type "makepkg" versus "less PKGBUILD" isn't significant. Contrast this to using a helper, where pressing a key to continue building is an awful lot more tempting than having the helper open the PKGBUILD in your editor (where you now have to press many more keys to continue)--regardless of the defaults.

You could make the same argument about effort to skip checking being fewer keystrokes to argue that yaourt makes its more convenient to check because that is also fewer keystrokes than typing an additional command manually in the command line. Thus I think the actual reality is people who are lazy will skip a self audit regardless of how they choose to build the package. Ie youart isn't problem.

> Plus, using the helper as a glorified fetch tool gives you something of an intermediate package cache as opposed to dumping everything in /tmp and nuking it between boots.

So change the build location. It's all configurable. /tmp makes sense as a default but I have mine set elsewhere. On a previous system I even had yaourt configured to build in its own ZFS tank.

> Also, I believe yaourt is considered deprecated as it hasn't seen updates in quite some time. I'd suggest something else like aurman or yay.

I often hear the same complaint made about Android apps (re it's not been updated in a while) but when it already does everything it needs to then why should it need to see further updates? It's not like yaourt doesn't keep track of security updates (I mean it's all just wrappers around GNU and BSD tools so if there's a bug in tar or OpenSSL then they will be updated independently anyway).

I've been using yaourt for several years and frankly I've never once felt "damn, this thing needs more maintenance".