← Back to context

Comment by raesene9

7 years ago

Thing is, IBM does not have a great reputation for how it manages its staff as it tends to favour moving positions to low cost locations and redundancies that provide the minimum possible payouts

e.g.

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/04/18/ibm/ https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/03/29/ibm_layoffs/ https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/03/27/ibm_tss/ https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/01/23/ibm_gts_workforce_o...

(and that's just from this year)

they also have a reputation for being primarily concerned with the bottom line (profit-wise) over other drivers.

So concerns around how they'll manage this kind of acquisition seem at least somewhat justified.