Comment by p1necone
7 years ago
This actually seems like fair policy to me, think of the mess Red Hat would be in if IBM decided that they had copyright on your contributions to Cygwin.
Or is my understanding of copyright law off base?
7 years ago
This actually seems like fair policy to me, think of the mess Red Hat would be in if IBM decided that they had copyright on your contributions to Cygwin.
Or is my understanding of copyright law off base?
That's exactly why Red Hat had said permission slips. The ridiculous thing was that IBM refused to sign them
The ridiculous thing is that IP law makes this necessary.
> if IBM decided that they had copyright on your contributions to Cygwin.
How could they decide this if you'd have written the code on a weekend?
Many employers have clauses about owning any IP you produce while employed there, regardless of whether or not it involved company time or property. Whether said clauses are actually enforceable varies from location to location.
Aka "justice by bank balance and time".
At some point software engineering is going to have a union just as a legal defence fund.
1 reply →
The FSF doesn't want to get caught up in a dispute, and thus requires explicit disclaimers of work-for-hire interest from employers https://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-assign.en.html