Comment by kgwgk
7 years ago
This thread made me look at Clojure again (it has been a few years since the last time). Searching for Bayesian inference libraries I came across this: https://github.com/cemerick/raposo
"Never, ever, ever give a talk about a library or other code publicly unless it's in a public repo prior to the talk. Period. (Exceptions to this might be things like case studies and such.) Doing otherwise is surely irritating to talk attendees, but it's even more disrespectful towards organizers, as their acceptance of your talk may have been implicitly preconditioned on the attendees being able to benefit from the code/library/project in question."
Is the expectation now that when you talk about something it is necessarily going to be open source? (And from there the expectations grow and grow...)
That quotation is prefaced as "lessons I hope to take to heart". He's not commanding everyone to do it.
Would you agree that talking about unavailable code or libraries is "irritating to talk attendees" and "even more disrespectful towards organizers"?
The author is saying those things about his own talks, not generally of everyone. Unless you're trying to claim they are never true in any case, I don't think there's anything to disagree about here.
5 replies →
I'm fuzzy on the details, but there's legal precedent for suing someone for reproducing your code even if they haven't copied any of it.
Otherwise its called marketing and you have to pay for it. (Not get paid for it)
Sometimes I hear presentations just to learn how they approached a problem remotely similar to mine or used tools I am interested in using myself. The library and its exact implementation are mostly irrelevant in that case.
One thing that I've found increasingly distasteful (I've noticed it in the React community, but it may be a wider trend), is the use of conference talks to announce/launch projects.
Thankfully it's still usually the case that the content of the talk is generally valuable. But ultimately, if I'm paying to fly somewhere and see your talk, I'm there to learn, not to witness your own self-promotion.
I guess it's no worse than the other main use of conference talks I've seen, which is to hawk the speaker's latest book. Maybe that's diminished somewhat, I have not been to many conferences lately but 10-15 years ago it seemed like most talks were peppered with phrases like "I talk more about this in my book..."
It's possible I was lucky with some of the conferences I went to, which had talks very much in the vein of "here's a new/different way to think about things". And I don't mind people using their own projects/products as a demonstration of what they're trying to communicate. But when they start to feel like Apple's product announcement keynotes, it feels something has gone wrong.