Comment by burlesona
8 years ago
In the field this is the idea of General Intilligence versus narrow intelligence.
Alexa, for example, is an Artificial Narrow Intelligence. It can process speech and then follow different scripts with instructions derived from that speech, but it often fails comically so you as the human have to talk to it just right for it to work. Not too different from a verbal command line.
Meanwhile a human personal assistant has general intelligence. You can just tell them what you want and they can understand and figure it out.
> Alexa, for example, is an Artificial Narrow Intelligence [...] often fails comically
I'd venture that your coda nullifies the "Intelligence" part thoroughly and completely. She's an "Artificial Smart Assistant", at best.
The problem is we have no useful definition for intelligence and therefore no way useful metric to measure.