← Back to context

Comment by dfed-mpls

7 years ago

"RISC architecture is gonna change everything."

Out in the real world, I know of cases where proprietary CPU or DSP IP was rejected in favor of RISC-V alternatives.

RISC-V may not change everything, but I do believe that it will change on thing in a major way: the financials of CPU IP such as Tensilica, Cortex-M0, ARC etc.

There is very little friction in replacing embedded controllers that are not customer facing. And that's a market were $0.01 in licensing fees can be a big deal.

Edit: in the maker world, the so-called Blue Pill is incredibly popular. It has an STM32F103 SOC with a 72MHz Cortex M3 and tons of digital and analog interfaces. On AliExpress, these boards go for $1.60 a piece!

https://wiki.stm32duino.com/index.php?title=Blue_Pill

  • > There is very little friction in replacing embedded controllers that are not customer facing. And that's a market were $0.01 in licensing fees can be a big deal.

    Reminds me of USB vs Firewire. Firewire was the superior of the two yet it lost. Why? USB didn't have Fw's $0.25 licensing fee per manufactured device.

    • $0.25 is very, very high.

      I don't know who was supposed to pay the $0.25, but gizmos like external hard drives is a commodity market with razor thin gross margins.

      Whoever decided that $0.25 was reasonable for that kind of market (Apple?) essentially killed the protocol right there.

      Edit: here's the story: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2017/06/the-rise-and-fall-of...

      Steve Jobs changed royalty model from a flat licensing fee to a $1 fee per port (insane!), Intel walked away and cancelled all FireWire development, Jobs lowered it then to $0.25 but Intel didn't come back.

      1 reply →

FYI man, alright. You could sit at home, and do like absolutely nothing, and your name goes through like 17 computers a day. 1984? Yeah right, man. That's a typo. Orwell is here now. He's livin' large. We have no names, man. No names. We are nameless!