Comment by satysin

7 years ago

So what you're saying is the mechanism they put in place to prevent your friends book from being pirated failed within months?

Yet all those who purchased it legally could one day be left with having their purchase shut off? They might be lucky and get refunds but they still lose access to the book.

To me that seems like an utter failure for everyone.

There was no DRM put on the book, it was book-form only. Someone copied it, made a PDF of it, and distributed it for free. His royalties plummeted to almost nothing.

  • So.. I am confused what your point is? DRM wouldn't have helped this situation, which I think actually HELPS the case against DRM... it only hurts legitimate readers, pirates would have gotten it anyway.

  • Can you disclose which textbook it was? I'm curious. Was it a good textbook?

    The textbook market is a predatory scheme to fleece money out of students who are usually pretty close to broke, by making the books more important even than healthy food.

    Not releasing a new edition every few years would have the same effect as "piracy", once the used market is large enough to supply each new class.

    Professors and professionals who write textbooks should treat them as a marketing and career advancement exercise. Write a good book, get noticed by tenure committees or potential consulting clients. Most people who write books like that already have relatively secure jobs, and the book, if it's not awful, improves their career trajectory even more. It builds their reputation or brand.

    It's tough to side with them over broke college students slavishly scanning thousand-page textbooks while eating ramen.