← Back to context Comment by wildfire 7 years ago Which, of course, makes it perfectly acceptable? 5 comments wildfire Reply gattilorenz 7 years ago No, but if Microsoft asked for wav files, and a contractor delivered them, is Microsoft at fault if the contractor used a pirated editing software? jacobush 7 years ago Liable? I hope so. And then they can pass the buck on. gattilorenz 7 years ago Why would Microsoft be liable?Do you check if your butcher has illegally bought his knife? Should you be liable, if so? 2 replies →
gattilorenz 7 years ago No, but if Microsoft asked for wav files, and a contractor delivered them, is Microsoft at fault if the contractor used a pirated editing software? jacobush 7 years ago Liable? I hope so. And then they can pass the buck on. gattilorenz 7 years ago Why would Microsoft be liable?Do you check if your butcher has illegally bought his knife? Should you be liable, if so? 2 replies →
jacobush 7 years ago Liable? I hope so. And then they can pass the buck on. gattilorenz 7 years ago Why would Microsoft be liable?Do you check if your butcher has illegally bought his knife? Should you be liable, if so? 2 replies →
gattilorenz 7 years ago Why would Microsoft be liable?Do you check if your butcher has illegally bought his knife? Should you be liable, if so? 2 replies →
No, but if Microsoft asked for wav files, and a contractor delivered them, is Microsoft at fault if the contractor used a pirated editing software?
Liable? I hope so. And then they can pass the buck on.
Why would Microsoft be liable?
Do you check if your butcher has illegally bought his knife? Should you be liable, if so?
2 replies →