Comment by burgerbrain
16 years ago
Well if IPv4 runs out soon enough and we successfully jump to IPv6, port forwarding in general has the potential to become a thing of the past.
That port forwarding is required isn't a bitcoin bug, it's a NAT bug.
16 years ago
Well if IPv4 runs out soon enough and we successfully jump to IPv6, port forwarding in general has the potential to become a thing of the past.
That port forwarding is required isn't a bitcoin bug, it's a NAT bug.
>when I don't have to keep a local copy of every transaction ever made by anyone on the whole system.
How about this part? That sounds like a pretty big flaw in the system.
You would need to correlate that information with other type of information to be able to identify the user. As long as you take certain precaution, you should be fine.
Well sure, but it sounds like it would require a lot of storage.
2 replies →