← Back to context

Comment by grugq

7 years ago

As I said, I should update it.

When I wrote it Android devices never got patched (hence the advice to switch to a FOSS rom that would be updated, rather than a frozen in time factory ROM.)

Security involves a lot more than just access to the source code. That is simply a factor in the ease of some techniques for vulnerability discovery. Back then Android had poor process isolation, significant problems with its sandbox, lax SELinux configurations, insecure software architecture (eg not using “least privilege”)

For a regular user, a stock iOS device is safer than an Android device because there is very little iOS malware in the wild. For a user at risk, then they are safer using a secured device, which by default means modified Android.

Security is not a generic “thing”. It is a continuous process that provides countermeasures against threats by mitigating risks.

If you want a device that is safe by default, will always be patched, and is not vulnerable to indiscriminate exploitation or malware embedded in apps — use iOS.

You can achieve that with a Google Android device (starting with about v8 or so). Of course you still have to be vigilant against malware laden apps.