← Back to context Comment by gnode 7 years ago > it s not reminiscentAs is the nature of futurism. 1 comment gnode Reply buboard 7 years ago OK to be clear this is close to the futurist style of the 70s, but not exactlyhttps://d14e8oeg5e788p.cloudfront.net/content/56310/c8d68987...http://oldconceptcars.com/wp-content/uploads/lancia_stratos_...it's definitely not what is considered futurist today. It's not only ugly, but doesnt even fit well in a retro futurism classification. i know that there's no accounting for taste, but this is a uniquely ugly car, and not in an innovative way.
buboard 7 years ago OK to be clear this is close to the futurist style of the 70s, but not exactlyhttps://d14e8oeg5e788p.cloudfront.net/content/56310/c8d68987...http://oldconceptcars.com/wp-content/uploads/lancia_stratos_...it's definitely not what is considered futurist today. It's not only ugly, but doesnt even fit well in a retro futurism classification. i know that there's no accounting for taste, but this is a uniquely ugly car, and not in an innovative way.
OK to be clear this is close to the futurist style of the 70s, but not exactly
https://d14e8oeg5e788p.cloudfront.net/content/56310/c8d68987...
http://oldconceptcars.com/wp-content/uploads/lancia_stratos_...
it's definitely not what is considered futurist today. It's not only ugly, but doesnt even fit well in a retro futurism classification. i know that there's no accounting for taste, but this is a uniquely ugly car, and not in an innovative way.