← Back to context

Comment by rkagerer

6 years ago

He also feels ZFS "was always more of a buzzword than anything else". Yikes.

Honestly, I wouldn't bash him for this comment. Not everyone runs a 10+ TB array at their home for storage and backup purposes.

ZFS doesn't primarily target single disks and small arrays anyway. :)

  • ZFS made wonders for me with very small servers (appliances) with SSDs that were forced to operate in remote areas on unstable power supply - where other file systems were dropping bytes and bricking them.

  • It's great on small disks, using ZFS root on solaris 11 in my day job, I can tell you it makes management a lot easier. Patching and rollbacks are like eating a nice dessert.

  • people probably will, in a few years.

    rotational disks are getting cheaper and cheaper, 10TB disks in two years might cost as little as 2TB disks today (i got a 2TB disk for like 50€ off Amazon).

    • > people probably will, in a few years.

      Yes, but without the array as you stated. We have 300+ 10TB disks at our datacenter today and, ZFS is relevant at this disk count, I/O and client load.

      Running ZFS at small scale is raising a cow at home for a bucket of raw milk. It's more of a fun curiosity rather than a production level operation.

      I'd run LVM or md or something similar at home instead of a full blown ZFS setup for practical reasons.

      10 replies →