Comment by phkahler
5 years ago
If it's OK to demand a project use only Rust and not unsafe Rust, then it must be OK to bitch at every C or C++ project and demand they rewrite in Rust. If that sounds absurd, that's because it's supposed to.
5 years ago
If it's OK to demand a project use only Rust and not unsafe Rust, then it must be OK to bitch at every C or C++ project and demand they rewrite in Rust. If that sounds absurd, that's because it's supposed to.
That's not really an apples-to-apples comparison.
From what I can tell, actix was using unsafe code to improve benchmark performance, not because safe code was extra work. That's fine, but it was misleadingly marketed as more than a toy project, and it shouldn't have been.
Further, rewriting a project is very different from just making different coding decisions when maintaining an existing project.
I still think the actix critics are showing how irresponsible they are for blindly using a library without researching it well.