Doesn't WebRTC need a TURN server to proxy traffic when you're behind a NAT? It's not really peer to peer when all the data goes through a central point.
TURN only proxies if it’s unable to make a connection via STUN, which requires the server to handle only a few packets when the initial connection is formed and provides direct peer to peer access after. Many home NATs only need the latter.
From experience WebRTC starts to fall down in rooms of more than 8 people for video chat.
Meanwhile Zoom and Discord (who use servers) can achieve much greater so YMMV
That said p2p definitely has its advantages
Its just a case of p2p with people running servers (like bitcoint does) and differentiating between the two based on a bandwidth test.
Doesn't WebRTC need a TURN server to proxy traffic when you're behind a NAT? It's not really peer to peer when all the data goes through a central point.
TURN only proxies if it’s unable to make a connection via STUN, which requires the server to handle only a few packets when the initial connection is formed and provides direct peer to peer access after. Many home NATs only need the latter.