← Back to context Comment by Narishma 6 years ago In what way are those interfaces clunky? 1 comment Narishma Reply MaxBarraclough 6 years ago I agree - I'd say clean rather than clunky. The old and (by modern standards) spartan appearance of Windows 95 applications doesn't mean the UI design is no good. Similarly, command-line interfaces can be very effective, even if they lack GUI gloss.Somewhat related: long live the FOX Toolkit and its hard-coded Windows 95 theme http://fox-toolkit.org/screenshots.html
MaxBarraclough 6 years ago I agree - I'd say clean rather than clunky. The old and (by modern standards) spartan appearance of Windows 95 applications doesn't mean the UI design is no good. Similarly, command-line interfaces can be very effective, even if they lack GUI gloss.Somewhat related: long live the FOX Toolkit and its hard-coded Windows 95 theme http://fox-toolkit.org/screenshots.html
I agree - I'd say clean rather than clunky. The old and (by modern standards) spartan appearance of Windows 95 applications doesn't mean the UI design is no good. Similarly, command-line interfaces can be very effective, even if they lack GUI gloss.
Somewhat related: long live the FOX Toolkit and its hard-coded Windows 95 theme http://fox-toolkit.org/screenshots.html