← Back to context

Comment by pfdietz

6 years ago

That does not display for me. Useless.

Let me repeat: we have copper and stainless (chromium) steel pots and pans (or, in the case of stainless steel, surgical implants!) The idea that PV is dangerous because of those metals is absurd on its face. Chromium toxicity is from highly oxidized (hexavalent) chromium that will not be produced from Cr in ordinary structural materials.

My priors for interpreting statements like yours is to treat them as garbage. This is because renewables have been subject to an endless stream of BS criticism for decades. The expectation upon seeing more such clearly dubious criticism, such as yours that flies in the face of elementary chemistry, is that it's just more of the same.

Wow, typical shill ignoring facts. How can I win an argument when you have this amazing logical basis?

>1 to 10 is dangerous

>3 and 4 is not dangerous, so you are completely wrong, and I can't see your facts so it's useless and wrong, go solar!

Yeah, I'll trust my government and scientists and professors who actually have degrees in the field more than you, thank you very much. Oh yeah, in your opinion they are coal industry shills so they are just "wrong", aren't they? lol

Downvote all you want, I don't give a f. But you can't change the truth.