No idea, I'm not a lawyer. But in the original post he mentioned that he "cut a deal" with the restaurant, which to me suggests that he got the $5k back, possibly in cash, from the restaurant. If he then pockets to tax he saved, that smells like tax evasion.
He then tweaked his story to say that this cost him $5k. Why did he say he was cutting a deal then?
In this case DD is essentially acting like a ticket scalper. And since DD screwed themselves, is there even a law broken?
No idea, I'm not a lawyer. But in the original post he mentioned that he "cut a deal" with the restaurant, which to me suggests that he got the $5k back, possibly in cash, from the restaurant. If he then pockets to tax he saved, that smells like tax evasion.
He then tweaked his story to say that this cost him $5k. Why did he say he was cutting a deal then?
I think he’s saying the owner will comp him deliveries. Not pay him back.
1 reply →
You make a great point. They also mention they are an options trader on wall street, so $5000 easily could be throwaway money for a double-good cause
2 replies →