Comment by mc32
5 years ago
Every feasible interpretation? No way. That’s not gonna work. No one would be able to say anything. At best people would talk like ex Fed chair Greenspan. Undoable.
5 years ago
Every feasible interpretation? No way. That’s not gonna work. No one would be able to say anything. At best people would talk like ex Fed chair Greenspan. Undoable.
Yes, every feasible interpretation. That doesn't mean you can't say anything without multiple interpretations, but it _does_ mean that, if you are called on another interpretation of your words, then you spoke unclearly. You need to clarify your meaning and apologize if it was flagrant.
Yes, that is a lot of overhead for communicating. That's what I believe we should expect of our elected leaders. Sadly, nearly half of voting Americans don't seem to agree with me.
You think people are going to vote for that?
Obama embodied empathy. I wish we had more politicians like that on both sides of the aisle.
2 replies →
Please point me to something Obama said that could be interpreted as inciting deadly vigilante violence.
I’ll wait.
Why is that the metric?
Comparing the current president with their predecessor in charge does not seem unreasonable.
2 replies →