← Back to context

Comment by forgingahead

6 years ago

You don't need to be rude to the parent poster.

They have real experiences of a union in their company. You have examples of unions in your country. Who is correct?

If your answer is yourself, then you're not understanding the point or the concern that people who are against unions have. It doesn't matter if Sweden implemented it well and somewhere else implemented it poorly. Bottom line is that the poorly-implemented scenario can happen, does happen, and in fact happens more often than anecdata of "oh no true union does that".

Unless you can propose a foolproof way that the "wrong way" is always prevented, then you will get opposition to your beliefs. Calling people or things stupid doesn't solve that.

The way to prevent "the wrong way" is to have a collaborative relation to the unions, rather than one of all out war.

Don't like your deal, which doesn't let everyone move tables? Negotiate a new one. Maybe you can offer them something they'd rather want instead.

Having a let hostile environment also let smaller, more agile unions thrive, instead of forcing them to all join together.