← Back to context

Comment by TheRealPomax

5 years ago

I'm not sure how slqite as your application file format has anything to do with open source, honestly. It's certainly super easy for open source projects to use, but a closed source proprietary application using an encrypted sqlite file sounds perfectly sensible to me?

We all win when folks decide to leave it accessible, but I'm not going to hold "encrypting a file format so that people can't easily reverse engineer it" against folks who are trying to sell software.

> I'm not going to hold "encrypting a file format so that people can't easily reverse engineer it" against folks who are trying to sell software.

I think I'd mostly disagree. Selling an application is one thing, but the data itself is usually customers' and holding their data hostage is not a proper thing to do.

  • That's a tenuous argument at best, heavily relying on the application in question not offering any way to export your data, which many applications do come with. Just because the file format is locked, doesn't mean the data in it is locked. You just need the application to unlock it.

    • This is self contradictory.

      Listen to what you're saying: the data isn't locked, you just need the... application, to... unlock it.

      That's beyond tenuous, it's invalid.

      2 replies →

I guess he/she meant that the extension that encrypts the database is proprietary. I believe that was the only option for a while but now there is an open source alternative.