← Back to context

Comment by catacombs

6 years ago

> I hope that the journalist gets revealed and fired.

Not going to happen. The reporter was doing his job. No one will lose their job just because your favorite blogger agreed to go on the record for an interview and is not upset that his identity will be revealed.

It doesn't matter if anyones favorite or hated.

Breaking trust, going against wished how people prefer to be addressed and endangering people for now good reason - well, it's at most style of irresponsible, tabloid-level journalism.

If NYT aims for tabloid level standard, indeed, the journalist was doing his job.

  • > Breaking trust, going against wished how people prefer to be addressed and endangering people for now good reason - well, it's at most style of irresponsible, tabloid-level journalism.

    Did you read SSC's post? SSC didn't mention anything of a "promise" or "agreement" for the reporter to not use his name. The reporter found it another way.

    Now, if SSC explicitly said the reporter promised not to use his name, then that opens a new can of worms.

    • Doxxing is not something new. Scott Alexander is clear about his anonymity.

      If a journalist interviewed a popular camgirl who introduced herself as (say) LustyClaraXXX, and then "did research" to compare pictures, and revealed her legal name an occupation (say, a schoolteacher), would you consider it ethical?

      If yes, why so? If no, why so?

      1 reply →

  • Journalists shouldn't print anonymous articles. Journalists should use anonymous sources as little as possible.

    "Tabloid level" journalism is how I would describe stories full of anonymous sources.

    • > Journalists shouldn't print anonymous articles. Journalists should use anonymous sources as little as possible.

      Correct. But there are times when anonymous sources are necessary. Look at WaPo and NYT's political coverage. They use many political insiders who can't go on the record but reveal necessary information for the public.

      One example: Trump's "shit hole countries" comment. That came from anonymous sources who were in the room, backed up with a few on-the-record commends from outsiders.