← Back to context

Comment by jerkstate

6 years ago

NYT frequently uses anonymous sources, even in cases where it doesn't seem to be necessary. Search for "sources familiar with the matter" +site:nytimes.com for dozens of examples per month.

The difference is presumably that those sources keep feeding them interesting information, so they have to respect their anonymity to avoid jeopardizing that relationship. Scott is only good for one story, so they can treat him however they want.

  • Presumably there are many other one-off sources that would see this behavior and then not talk to the NYT, so I’m not convinced that explains it.