← Back to context

Comment by titanomachy

6 years ago

I think his given explanation is plausible. Having that much opinion and personal information tied publicly to his real identity _would_ make it hard to do his job as a psychiatrist well. Presumably that is very important to him, possibly even more important than the blog, especially when you take into account the personal safety issues of doxxing.

I agree, it's plausible.

But journalists don't stop at "plausible" and then write, they keep digging until they have "the facts" (or their biased version of the facts) right?