← Back to context

Comment by lliamander

5 years ago

> Yes, thanks for pointing that out (fyi interesting example because Switzerland has a lot of guns per capita)

Indeed, the choice was intentional.

> but the general widespread availability of weapons makes them very accessible, both legally and illegally, in specific locations wherein people are going to use them for 'bad things'.

While I don't think the problems of those specific locations should be ignored, their problems are also not a good justification to abridge the rights of people who live outside of those places.

> Also - that the vast majority of gun owners are 'very responsible' doesn't change the fact that as cops pull people over, there is a reasonable likelihood people will have weapons, which ratchets up the likelihood that someone, even in a 'good area' will do something bad. The likelihood is small, but enough to make a difference.

The impact of civilian gun ownership on police interactions is not something I've given much thought, and is worth exploring.

However, I will note that there are many sheriffs across the U.S. which actually encourage their county residents to own guns. There are many, many legitimate defensive guns uses each year.