Comment by spaetzleesser
5 years ago
I have read that this is how the NRA used to be. Focusing on training and safe practices. Only in the last decades that changed to where we are now.
5 years ago
I have read that this is how the NRA used to be. Focusing on training and safe practices. Only in the last decades that changed to where we are now.
When I was a teenager, the only gun safety and hunter training classes in my area were organized by the NRA. They were the only classes most ranges and hunting groups would accept, so we all took them. I'm not sure they'd be recognizable by anyone in today's NRA. A lot of emphasis was placed on proper use, and one of those "improper" uses was a gun for intimidation.
My instructor, in a deeply-conservative area of a deeply-conservative state state, was appalled at the idea of "open carry," and our instructional material warned against it as a bad idea. I wanted to look him up a few years ago when people were getting all bothered about Starbucks' firearms policy to see what he thought but he'd passed away a year before.
The NRA is the most recognized name in firearms training. A lot of states only recognize their training courses. A lot of the US gun community is unhappy with this since when we look at the history of the NRA (Negotiating our Rights Away) we see an entity that continually shows no attempt to stop the gross encroachment of 2nd amendment.
https://time.com/4431356/nra-gun-control-history/
The NRA is still heavily involved in hunter education, general firearms training and organizing classes for police departments.