Comment by james412
4 years ago
Last week Elon demo'd a pig that made bleeping sounds when it sniffed stuff and claimed this would cure depression and about 100 other conditions. Tell me, given everyone else in that sector (neuroscience) is wildly sceptical of Elon's claims, how does what Elon did last week compare to what Trevor is being accused of?
I think there's a difference between saying "Here is a demo of some tech on a pig that, some day, could treat depression in humans" and "We have treated depression and cured it, as you can see from this demo. Also, this is not a pig, it is a human."
Elon loves the former. Trevor appears to love the latter.
I'm not sure what you're getting at here: I've already said that I don't have much respect for either person.
It seems like you're trying to say that because Elon does it and has been successful, it's okay for Trevor to do it in his own pursuit of success. Which is a big nope nope nope. It just means both of them are doing shady things.
Is Neuralink publicly traded?
Forward thinking, speculative claims aren’t the same as fraud.