← Back to context Comment by Karunamon 5 years ago You can change your employer much easier than you can change your government. 3 comments Karunamon Reply petrocrat 5 years ago But there are no substantial distinctions between employers in terms of how the utilize the coercive leverage that they have. So this is an illusory "safety-net". Karunamon 5 years ago The relative ease of ending the relationship means the effect of that leverage is greatly reduced. jkestner 5 years ago Especially since Citizens United gave your employer outsized power to change the government.
petrocrat 5 years ago But there are no substantial distinctions between employers in terms of how the utilize the coercive leverage that they have. So this is an illusory "safety-net". Karunamon 5 years ago The relative ease of ending the relationship means the effect of that leverage is greatly reduced.
Karunamon 5 years ago The relative ease of ending the relationship means the effect of that leverage is greatly reduced.
jkestner 5 years ago Especially since Citizens United gave your employer outsized power to change the government.
But there are no substantial distinctions between employers in terms of how the utilize the coercive leverage that they have. So this is an illusory "safety-net".
The relative ease of ending the relationship means the effect of that leverage is greatly reduced.
Especially since Citizens United gave your employer outsized power to change the government.