Comment by maerF0x0

> who argues for limits.

+1 , want to add, almost everyone argues for limits on immigration because without limits that would be an argument for _unlimited_ immigration.

Sometimes we construe ourselves as vastly separated "islands" of ideologies, when in reality we're more like tight clusters. That is we have similar ideals, and differentiate on how to accomplish them.

For example "Help the poor" is often agreed upon, but then argued about "How to help the poor" . (Do we give them tough love and bootstraps yada yada? or Do we give them support, resources and encouragement and yada yada?).