← Back to context

Comment by renewiltord

5 years ago

People who don't like freedom. So by definition that's what they'll do. It isn't a judgment. It is definitionally correct.

This is tautology.

- Children need protection. They are eating children.

- Who are "they" here?

- Children eaters. So by definition that's what they'll do. It isn't a judgment. It is definitionally correct.

Cf

- Freedom is fragile. I won't give one inch here because they will shatter it.

- Who are "they" here?

- People who don't like freedom. So by definition that's what they'll do. It isn't a judgment. It is definitionally correct.

  • Right, children need protection from children eaters. You won't find me questioning that. No logical fallacy there. In fact, that's what a tautology is, a statement that's always true.