← Back to context Comment by alexellisuk 5 years ago "Only" 24k spam PRs. Face palm 3 comments alexellisuk Reply Aeolun 5 years ago Only 4.8% spam PRs better? The absolute number means nothing.In a sea of 5B PRs, 24k would look impossibly good. seba_dos1 5 years ago Does "only 24k MRs had maintainers that bothered to properly mark them as spam per hacktoberfest's guide" sound so "impossibly good" as well? dkersten 5 years ago The absolute number definitely does mean something! Its work created for maintainers. Checking and tagging a PR takes non-zero time. Creating 24,000 invalid PR's is a massive burden on the open source community.
Aeolun 5 years ago Only 4.8% spam PRs better? The absolute number means nothing.In a sea of 5B PRs, 24k would look impossibly good. seba_dos1 5 years ago Does "only 24k MRs had maintainers that bothered to properly mark them as spam per hacktoberfest's guide" sound so "impossibly good" as well? dkersten 5 years ago The absolute number definitely does mean something! Its work created for maintainers. Checking and tagging a PR takes non-zero time. Creating 24,000 invalid PR's is a massive burden on the open source community.
seba_dos1 5 years ago Does "only 24k MRs had maintainers that bothered to properly mark them as spam per hacktoberfest's guide" sound so "impossibly good" as well?
dkersten 5 years ago The absolute number definitely does mean something! Its work created for maintainers. Checking and tagging a PR takes non-zero time. Creating 24,000 invalid PR's is a massive burden on the open source community.
Only 4.8% spam PRs better? The absolute number means nothing.
In a sea of 5B PRs, 24k would look impossibly good.
Does "only 24k MRs had maintainers that bothered to properly mark them as spam per hacktoberfest's guide" sound so "impossibly good" as well?
The absolute number definitely does mean something! Its work created for maintainers. Checking and tagging a PR takes non-zero time. Creating 24,000 invalid PR's is a massive burden on the open source community.