← Back to context Comment by nomel 4 years ago So is checking for security certificates good or bad, now? 2 comments nomel Reply sjwright 4 years ago If you've suffered inconvenience from having checks but not suffered inconvenience from no checks, then it's bad.If you've suffered inconvenience from no checks but not suffered inconvenience from having checks, then it's good. juliend2 4 years ago Since this check is currently done _unencrypted_ (as lapcatsoftware said in his post), I'd say it's objectively bad.
sjwright 4 years ago If you've suffered inconvenience from having checks but not suffered inconvenience from no checks, then it's bad.If you've suffered inconvenience from no checks but not suffered inconvenience from having checks, then it's good.
juliend2 4 years ago Since this check is currently done _unencrypted_ (as lapcatsoftware said in his post), I'd say it's objectively bad.
If you've suffered inconvenience from having checks but not suffered inconvenience from no checks, then it's bad.
If you've suffered inconvenience from no checks but not suffered inconvenience from having checks, then it's good.
Since this check is currently done _unencrypted_ (as lapcatsoftware said in his post), I'd say it's objectively bad.